Re: [SAtalk] spamc -d setting

2003-12-02 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:26 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote: I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for the two spamd servers? I was think I could have the setting like: spamc -d primary.spamd.com, secondary.spamd

Re: [SAtalk] spamc -d setting

2003-12-01 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:12 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote: If i understand this now. By using DNS then one server will be used for the most of the time because it will want to use the IP address that it got from the first lookup of the DNS address? adding -H will cause it to randomize the order of the result

Re: [SAtalk] spamc -d setting

2003-12-01 Thread Douglas Kirkland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 December 2003 12:54, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 02:26 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote: > >I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two > >different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for t

[SAtalk] spamc -d setting

2003-12-01 Thread Douglas Kirkland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for the two spamd servers? I was think I could have the setting like: spamc -d primary.spamd.com, secondary.sp