Re: [SAtalk] report_safe 2 behavior

2003-11-26 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:02:19AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote: > so basically if i do report_safe > 0, and the message is text/plain and > found to be spam, there is no way of keeping the message in tact without > attachment? As I said, there are two options: add headers to the message, or encap

Re: [SAtalk] report_safe 2 behavior

2003-11-26 Thread Adam Denenberg
so basically if i do report_safe > 0, and the message is text/plain and found to be spam, there is no way of keeping the message in tact without attachment? adam On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:38, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote: > > Is there a

Re: [SAtalk] report_safe 2 behavior

2003-11-26 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote: > Is there a way to use report_safe 2 simply to "defang mime" spam > emails and not attach them all? I thought this was something that could > be controlled but i cant seem to get it to do so. There is no "defang" ability anymore i

[SAtalk] report_safe 2 behavior

2003-11-26 Thread Adam Denenberg
Hello, I am having an issue with the behavior of report_safe 2. I would only like "unsafe" emails to be attached if spam is detected (non text/plain MIME type). However it seems that report_safe 2 attaches _ALL_ spam emails, and then in addition to the spam report, creates an unsafe_report if t

Re: [SAtalk] report_safe 2 behavior

2003-11-26 Thread Adam Denenberg
just to update my previous post, text/plain messages are appearing in the orginal email, but all the headers are showing up in the email body as well. Is this supposed to happen? I just want to be able "defang" emails if necessary, otherwise leave text/plain messages untouched.. is this possible t