=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_Guay-Leroux?= writes:
> What is the reason for Bayes in spamassassin to use the 150 most significant
> tokens in a email if Paul Graham mentions that you only should use the
> fifteen most significant ?
It got better results in empirical testing. Check back throug
What is the reason for Bayes in spamassassin to use
the 150 most significant tokens in a email if Paul Graham mentions that you
only should use the fifteen most significant ?
Quote from Paul Graham :
“Fourth, they calculated probabilities
differently. They used all the tokens, whereas
