Re: [SAtalk] postfix-2.0.13-20030706

2003-07-11 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Tony Earnshaw wrote: The new TLS patch for Postfix 2.0.13 doesn't work properly yet, smtpd and smtp have to talk to Amavisd unencrypted and encryption can't be turned off at the moment to talk to Amavisd (bug), so the smtpd servers should not advertise STARTTLS on an EHLO. The above has now bee

Re: [SAtalk] postfix-2.0.13-20030706

2003-07-11 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Lucas Albers wrote: So now their are three mail combinations that can block spam at the smtp 5xx rejection stage. SA-Mimedefang-Sendmail Postfix-2.xxx-CVS+AMavis SA-Exim Don't forget Tom Kistner's Exiscan for Exim 4, either. That can do virus scanning too, like Amavisd-new (needs extra virus scan

Re: [SAtalk] postfix-2.0.13-20030706

2003-07-10 Thread Lucas Albers
> What's new about it, is that Postfix/amavisd-new - with this snapshot - > can now do realtime smtp 5xx rejection of spam/virus (or save them to a > quarantine directory, as before.) That lifts Postfix into SA-Exim 4's > class as far as I'm concerned and I'm happy to be able to support it :-) > >

Re: [SAtalk] postfix-2.0.13-20030706

2003-07-08 Thread Max Paperno
At 7/8/2003 06:23 PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote: >The snapshot doesn't depend on Amavis for this. Any similar product with Amavis' >properties could be used as proxy. But the normal Postfix/SA filter routine wouldn't >have the same possibilities as Amavis. I can't comment on spampd (that's spamp

[SAtalk] postfix-2.0.13-20030706

2003-07-08 Thread Tony Earnshaw
For anyone who cares, I spent a day testing the above Postfix snapshot with amavisd-new and the Mail::SpamAssassin 2.60-CVS libraries. This is an advanced Postfix setup, with full (MD5, GSSAPI, OTP etc) SASL/LDAP-based SMTP AUTH and full TLS support. What's new about it, is that Postfix/amavisd