Tony Earnshaw wrote:
The new TLS patch for Postfix 2.0.13 doesn't work properly yet, smtpd
and smtp have to talk to Amavisd unencrypted and encryption can't be
turned off at the moment to talk to Amavisd (bug), so the smtpd servers
should not advertise STARTTLS on an EHLO.
The above has now bee
Lucas Albers wrote:
So now their are three mail combinations that can block spam at the smtp
5xx rejection stage.
SA-Mimedefang-Sendmail
Postfix-2.xxx-CVS+AMavis
SA-Exim
Don't forget Tom Kistner's Exiscan for Exim 4, either. That can do virus
scanning too, like Amavisd-new (needs extra virus scan
> What's new about it, is that Postfix/amavisd-new - with this snapshot -
> can now do realtime smtp 5xx rejection of spam/virus (or save them to a
> quarantine directory, as before.) That lifts Postfix into SA-Exim 4's
> class as far as I'm concerned and I'm happy to be able to support it :-)
>
>
At 7/8/2003 06:23 PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>The snapshot doesn't depend on Amavis for this. Any similar product with Amavis'
>properties could be used as proxy. But the normal Postfix/SA filter routine wouldn't
>have the same possibilities as Amavis. I can't comment on spampd (that's spamp
For anyone who cares, I spent a day testing the above Postfix snapshot
with amavisd-new and the Mail::SpamAssassin 2.60-CVS libraries. This is
an advanced Postfix setup, with full (MD5, GSSAPI, OTP etc)
SASL/LDAP-based SMTP AUTH and full TLS support.
What's new about it, is that Postfix/amavisd