Re: [SAtalk] more false positives from 2.11 (5/7) (fwd)

2002-03-07 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: > > This particular message got flagged as spam by SA... and it's coming from > the list. > > Is that expected behavior? (I'm NOT running the latest 2.11) Yes, absolutely. One of the benefits is detecting spam even through mailing lists. -- Matt. <:-

[SAtalk] more false positives from 2.11 (5/7) (fwd)

2002-03-06 Thread Ricardo Kleemann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] more false positives from 2.11 (5/7) this one caught on: possibly forged received header no real name in from from ends in numbers body has line > 199 chars forged yahoo how in the world would I tell sa that this is ok? -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homei

[SAtalk] more false positives from 2.11 (5/7)

2002-03-06 Thread Douglas J Hunley
this one caught on: possibly forged received header no real name in from from ends in numbers body has line > 199 chars forged yahoo how in the world would I tell sa that this is ok? -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-s