echnical
e-mails.
Gene
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig
> Hughes
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:38 AM
> To: Matt Sergeant; 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; Spamassassin-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SA
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:40:02PM -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
| On 31 January 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said:
| > Thanks for the reply. I am not so good interpreting the tests. Does anyone
| > know of a good reference that would help me to interpret what the test is
| > doing?
|
| Randall
'pay off debt' gets only 9 hits in the corpus
'pay off your debt' gets 86
'debt' shows up almost 10,000 times though, so we might want a broader rule
'debt free' shows up 600 times
'pay off.*debt' -- 226
'debt consolidation' -- over 400
We probably should be a little careful, since if someone
On 31 January 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said:
> Thanks for the reply. I am not so good interpreting the tests. Does anyone
> know of a good reference that would help me to interpret what the test is
> doing?
Randall Schwartz, *Learning Perl*
Larry Wall et. al., *Programming Perl*
Jef
> The LINE_OF_YELLING test is (IMHO) too picky in SA 2.0 (and, I presume,
> 2.01). See the archive for details. Bottom line, the line has to be >=
> 45 characters long, and there has to be a YELLING word >= 5 chars long
> >= 20 chars from either end. I proposed a couple of lame replacements,
>
On 31 January 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson said:
> What puzzles me is that this one should have gotten a LINE OF YELLING and
> UNSUBSCRIBE. Something appears broken.
The LINE_OF_YELLING test is (IMHO) too picky in SA 2.0 (and, I presume,
2.01). See the archive for details. Bottom line, t
>
>
> I'm seeing a lot of debt stuff too...
>
> How about:
>
> body PAY_OFF_DEBT /pay off (your )?debt/i
> describe PAY_OFF_DEBT A "pay off your debt" spam
>
> Matt.
> --
> <:->Get a smart net
>
What puzzles me is that this one should have gotten a LINE OF YELLING and
UNSUBSCRIBE. Something appe
t; Sent: 31 January 2002 16:12
> To: Spamassassin-Talk
> Subject: [SAtalk] missed Spam in v2.01
>
>
> Upgraded to v2.01 and seem to be getting more missed Spam
> than in v1.5.
> This one message that I just recieved made it thru. I would
> have thought
> that the &quo
Upgraded to v2.01 and seem to be getting more missed Spam than in v1.5.
This one message that I just recieved made it thru. I would have thought
that the "line of yelling" and "unsubscribe" would have triggered a score
but they were missed.
Here it is:
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTE
