On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:35:27PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Indeed -- so there is no AWL being created. Could you add a "-D" and send
> the top of spamd.log?
>
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -a 1000 /usr/bin/spamd -F 1 -L -x -u spamc -D
debug: ignore: test message to precompile patterns and
On 2/28/02 4:18 PM, "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope. There is no autowhitelist. Unless you tell me otherwise :-)
>>> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -a 1000 /usr/bin/spamd -F 1 -L -x \
>>> -u spamc > /var/log/spamd.log 2>&1
>
> As you can see - no "-a" option.
Indeed -- so ther
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:02:38PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> How big is your autowhitelist DB getting? That's the only thing I can
> imagine that could be responsible. Particularly since you're forcing the
> userid to spamc...
Nope. There is no autowhitelist. Unless you tell me otherwise :-)
How big is your autowhitelist DB getting? That's the only thing I can
imagine that could be responsible. Particularly since you're forcing the
userid to spamc...
C
On 2/28/02 3:27 PM, "Jason Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running SA-2.1 under daemontools and am using softlimits (like
I'm running SA-2.1 under daemontools and am using softlimits (like ulimits)
to limit the amount of memory a process can use.
It's really weird. When I started using 2.1 spamd, I had the memory limit
set to 7Mb. This worked - for a while. Then SA started crashing saying it
was out of memory - daem
