At 04:26 PM 9/25/03 -0400, Dominic Germain wrote:
I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA 2.60
instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't figure
why SA 2.6 ignore my /etc/mai
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 19:35, Javier Henderson wrote:
> * Dominic Germain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030925 17:34]:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
> > already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA
> > 2.60 instead of 2.5
* Dominic Germain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030925 17:34]:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
> already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA
> 2.60 instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't
> figure why S
SA 2.6 uses /perl/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
It's in the docs and if you use -D (for debug) it will tell you where it's
looking.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Dominic Germain wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup
Hi,
I just set up a new server with SA 2.60. It's almost the same setup I
already done on my "real" server. There is 2 differences: I use SA
2.60 instead of 2.55 and I use Perl 5.6.0 instead of 5.8.0... I can't
figure why SA 2.6 ignore my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file...
There is NO
