Re: [SAtalk] incorrect info in X-Spam-Level header

2003-10-04 Thread Patrick Morris
Looks like you're probably scanning the message twice. Jay Pfaffman wrote: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on learn.coe.utk.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,FRONTPAGE, HTML_MESSAGE,SAVE_ON_INSURANCE autolearn=no

Re: [SAtalk] incorrect info in X-Spam-Level header

2003-10-04 Thread Jay Pfaffman
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 11:40:56 -0400, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:27:12AM -0500, Jay Pfaffman wrote: >> Have I done something stupid? I'm confused. > You're scanning the message twice. The first time rewrites the body as spam, > the second time just rewri

Re: [SAtalk] incorrect info in X-Spam-Level header

2003-10-04 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:27:12AM -0500, Jay Pfaffman wrote: > Have I done something stupid? I'm confused. You're scanning the message twice. The first time rewrites the body as spam, the second time just rewrites the header as non-spam. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: Psychotics are consisten

[SAtalk] incorrect info in X-Spam-Level header

2003-10-04 Thread Jay Pfaffman
I'm running postfix, spamd & Spamassassin 2.60. I keep getting messages that should have been filtered by procmail in my mailbox. It seems that the X-Spam-Status header that I'm using to filter doesn't match what Spamassassing really thinks. Have I done something stupid? I'm confused. Look: X