>
> It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that
> time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message,
> and there
> is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by
> some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From addresses are valid)
Jon Myers wrote:
> It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that
> time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message, and there
> is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by
> some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From address
It looks like qfilter is inbetween qmail-smtpd and qmail-queue. By that
time, its too late, qmail-smtpd has already accepted the message, and there
is no way to return an error to the mailer that sent the spam (unless by
some amazing chance, the reply-to, and From addresses are valid). Or am I
m
Jon Myers wrote:
> This may be a big task, but has anyone thought about incorporating
> SpamAssassin into qmail-smtpd.
Why not use qfilter instead of a qmail patch?
http://www.untroubled.org/qmail-qfilter/
Lars Hansson
___
Have big p
This may be a big task, but has anyone thought about incorporating
SpamAssassin into qmail-smtpd. Doing this will allow the admin to have the
ability to reject spam, and return an ERROR to the initial relay/mailer.
Doing this should help in getting usernames removed from spam email lists,
or havi