Re: [SAtalk] hits vs. points

2002-12-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 12:16:51AM -0700, Michael Moncur wrote: > No. I think all uses should be changed to 'points'. I've run into some > people who had the impression that '5 hits required' means that anything > that matches five or more rules is marked spam, and it's really far more > sophistica

RE: [SAtalk] hits vs. points

2002-12-30 Thread Michael Moncur
> Okay, this is nit-picky, but is there a difference between "hits" and > "points" in the SPAM tag? No. I think all uses should be changed to 'points'. I've run into some people who had the impression that '5 hits required' means that anything that matches five or more rules is marked spam, and it

[SAtalk] hits vs. points

2002-12-30 Thread Patrick Bores
Hello, Okay, this is nit-picky, but is there a difference between "hits" and "points" in the SPAM tag? SPAM: Content analysis details: (6.30 hits, 5 required) SPAM: NO_REAL_NAME (1.3 points) From: does not include a real name SPAM: MARKETING_PARTNERS (1.7 points) BODY: Claims you regi