Raquel Rice wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:57:04 -0800
Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're not
spam, but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark
these?
Thank
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] hits over five yet not marked as spam...
>
>
> We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're
> not spam,
> but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
>
> However, I'm
che Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
> Auftrag von Jeff Lasman
> Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Januar 2004 15:57
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: [SAtalk] hits over five yet not marked as spam...
>
>
> We're being hit by MS securi
I use the procmail sanitizer ...
http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html
Been using it for years and it traps all of the garbage that people try to
send. Wonderful tool.
Brad
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they'r
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 09:56, Kang , Joseph S. wrote:
> > We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're
> > not spam,
> > but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
> >
> > However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark these?
>
> That's a good ques
> We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're
> not spam,
> but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
>
> However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark these?
That's a good question. I got a few of those yesterday (day before?), too.
I was fre
We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're not spam,
but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark these?
Thanks.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professio
