Kris Deugau wrote:
With your method of making sure mail gets scanned, mail will slowly
build up in the queue until the server runs out of disk space, the MTA
can't process the queue because it's too big, or SA's memory usage
triggers the Linux kernel OOM process killer. (Exactly which happens
fir
Tim B wrote:
> This way regardless of the reason, if X-SPAM-STATUS header is
> missing, we will assume spamc had some kind of problem, and then we
> will use the good ol' stand by command line spamassassin.
On a heavily loaded server, this is downright *suicidal*. spamd/spamc
are used to reduce s
I think we all have our favorite ways of calling spamc/spamassassin, and
one of my biggest concerns is that spamd will die for some obscure
reason and mail will stop getting scanned, or I'll be restarting spamd
and a flood mail suddendly comes in. Well this is how I finally settled
into my co
