Atalk] forged habeus mark
They don't need more law, they need more lawyers. Habeas is playing a
subtle legal game with intellectual property, one that's fairly
successful at dissuading spammers from forging their mark.
Hi,
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:58:37 -0800 "Gary Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As with all all other attempts we really need to see the proof in the
> pudding... If the zombies start using it then who do you sue?
The same people you always sue: the people with the money. :)
> Then we receive
As with all all other attempts we really need to see the proof in the pudding... If
the zombies start using it then who do you sue? Then we receive 8400+ per 8400+
emails. Not to sound bad but I think that Habeas has an uphill battle trying to hit
the spammers. They need to get some better l
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:10:17 -0500 (EST) Chuck Peters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I received my first " Habeas SWE (tm)" email today and what do you
> know, it's V|@gra spam.
There's a lot of that going around today. My copy came from an open
proxy in SBC netowrk space somewhere
I think I received my first " Habeas SWE (tm)" email today and what do you
know, it's V|@gra spam.
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (
Wow. almost a dozen in very little time. Given how well bayes is
working, I might just disable the habeus mark test.
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Sof
