Re: [SAtalk] explosion of spam not getting caught

2003-10-10 Thread Fred I-IS.COM
You might want to omit: RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED Those are not blacklists, they are to be used to help identify valid senders! Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. Louis LeBlanc wrote: > On 10/10/03 10:53 AM, Anne Ramey sat at the `puter and typed: >> I'm usin

Re: [SAtalk] explosion of spam not getting caught

2003-10-10 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 10/10/03 10:53 AM, Anne Ramey sat at the `puter and typed: > I'm using spamassassing through amavisd-new. Where would I put a rule > like the one below? In amavisd.conf or in local.cf? I'm getting close > to 100 mails per day per user get through. I'd imagine it should go in local.cf. ama

Re: [SAtalk] explosion of spam not getting caught

2003-10-10 Thread Anne Ramey
I'm using spamassassing through amavisd-new. Where would I put a rule like the one below? In amavisd.conf or in local.cf? I'm getting close to 100 mails per day per user get through. Thanks, Anne On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 12:22 PM, Louis LeBlanc wrote: On 10/08/03 10:21 AM, Anne Ramey

RE: [SAtalk] explosion of spam not getting caught

2003-10-08 Thread Larry Gilson
Hi Anne, I have seen a lot of hard-to-get tag messages come through. I am still using v2.55 so more messages could possibly get caught with 2.60. However, I have spent some time creating custom rules to tag the messages and that has worked very well for me. --Larry > -Original Message

[SAtalk] explosion of spam not getting caught

2003-10-08 Thread Anne Ramey
Is anyone else having problems with a *lot* more spam getting through spam assassin in the last week than ever before? I've updated spamassassin, my blacklists, and done an sa-learn. None of it seems to be making a dent. Spamassassin is catching spams, but not nearly enough--we are having ma