On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:21:19PM +0100, J?rgen R. Plasser wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> --On 03.12.2003 08:07 -0800 Dan Wilder wrote:
>
> >I'd hazard a guess there's something missing in your install
> >of RH's program development stuff.
> >
> >What does 'config.log' say? The additional details should
Hi Dan,
--On 03.12.2003 08:07 -0800 Dan Wilder wrote:
I'd hazard a guess there's something missing in your install
of RH's program development stuff.
What does 'config.log' say? The additional details should be
near the end.
I had the same thought and installed some developer stuff but it seems
Hi Charles,
--On 03.12.2003 11:07 -0500 Charles Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Jürgen R. Plasser wrote:
I'd like to install SA 2.60 from source on a RH 9 box
I used the binary rpms and as long as I uninstalled the old spamassassin
manually, the new multiple rpms went in fine.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:59:10PM +0100, J?rgen R. Plasser wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to install SA 2.60 from source on a RH 9 box and get the following
> error when doing a make:
>
> (perl Makefile.PL successfully done)
>
> make
> cd spamd; ./configure --prefix="/usr" --sysconfdir="/etc"
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Jürgen R. Plasser wrote:
> I'd like to install SA 2.60 from source on a RH 9 box
I used the binary rpms and as long as I uninstalled the old spamassassin
manually, the new multiple rpms went in fine.
- Charles
---
Hi all,
I'd like to install SA 2.60 from source on a RH 9 box and get the following
error when doing a make:
(perl Makefile.PL successfully done)
make
cd spamd; ./configure --prefix="/usr" --sysconfdir="/etc"
--datadir="/usr/share/spamassassin" --enable-ssl="no"
checking for gcc... gcc
checkin
