> Having said that, I think apart from the issues with AWL, it's not *too*
> bad.
>
> C
>
Here, Here!! :-)
Ed.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
I think a lot of work has been done to reduce false positives, and often
this may have the effect of increasing false-negatives (eg. badly
implemented AWL). I agree that it might have gone a bit far and that more
spam does seem to be slipping through. Luckily, it's fairly easy to rectify
this by
So far I have seen the following with v2.01 as compared to v1.5:
1. 2.01 appears to be better at reducing false positives that v1.5 - this
is good!
2. 2.01 appears to be worse with false negatives. There is alot more Spam
getting thru. I don't have the ability to run the false negatives thru 1
