Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:20 AM 1/14/04 -0500, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
No. I wouldn't expect it to read PDFs. For example, just now it didn't
read these types:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 1.7K --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 2.3K --]
[-- Type: text/html, Encoding: 7bit
I have a rule which looks for keywords in the body of a message. If
those words are NOT present it scores spam points. However, my
directives are not forcing spam assassin to read all body types. I'm
using "body" and "rawbody"
At first I thought it wasn't reading all 8-bit MIME attachments, but
r
At 09:20 AM 1/14/04 -0500, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
No. I wouldn't expect it to read PDFs. For example, just now it didn't
read these types:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 1.7K --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 2.3K --]
[-- Type: text/html, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 4.3K --]
Cheer
No. I wouldn't expect it to read PDFs. For example, just now it didn't
read these types:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 1.7K --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 2.3K --]
[-- Type: text/html, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 4.3K --]
Cheers,
Jeff
O Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:14:44AM -050
At 08:48 AM 1/14/04 -0500, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
I'd like to assign spam points to any message whose body does not contain
any one of several keywords. But unfortunately, I can't find a body
directive reads all body attachments. I tried "body" and "rawbody" but
there are still many body attachments
I'd like to assign spam points to any message whose body does not
contain any one of several keywords. But unfortunately, I can't find a
body directive reads all body attachments. I tried "body" and "rawbody"
but there are still many body attachments that pass through unscanned.
Since my match
