amAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases:
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/
-Original Message-
From: "Bryan Hoover"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 11/19/03 7:10:00 PM
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [SAtalk] bayes works!
At 08:10 PM 11/19/2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
Just wanted to mention that I'd been trying to clean up a polluted ham
corpus by using 'forget', but I continued to get poor results. Long
story short, I cleaned up my ham, and removed both ham, and spam that
had spambouncer headers - which I assume sa-l
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> The reason I mention it - aside from being pleased - is to point out
> that it appears the problem was either the old spambouncer headers, or
> forgetting, wasn't (the latter being what I started out suspecting,
> until I discovered the spambouncer header
Which I'm sure is no surprise to most.
Just wanted to mention that I'd been trying to clean up a polluted ham
corpus by using 'forget', but I continued to get poor results. Long
story short, I cleaned up my ham, and removed both ham, and spam that
had spambouncer headers - which I assume sa-learn
Well, on further examination, it seems I'm now automagically getting the
Bayes scores in my emails again. I've been reading on a parallel
discussion that it doesn't show up for emails like BAYES_50, so maybe
every single spam I've looked at in the last few days has fallen in that
range. Strange,
I've been using Spamassassin for 1-2 months now. For a while, I was
getting Bayes scores in my mail but I'm not getting them any longer. I
just looked at another user on the system (my wife) and her spams are
still being marked with BAYES_90, etc. in the headers but mine aren't.
Are there any ch
