Jack Gostl Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 11:38 PM:
> We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
Some quick queries of my spam stats log database say we're at over 75%.
Landy and Jack you are lucky. I'm sure there ar
Colin A. Bartlett
Kinetic Web Solutions
office: 610-831-9030 x51
mobile: 215-292-2193
home: 215-292-2616
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack
Gostl
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 11:38 PM
To: landy
Cc: SA
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bad day
Antonio Nó Rodríguez Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 6:06 PM
> How do you get those nice logs? I've been looking for something similar
> but haven't find anything yet.
> Thank you
> Antonio
I wrote an ASP script (It's all I know) that reads the maillog from our SA
server into our MS SQL server. It
At 17:55 13/10/2003 -0400, landy wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 20:54, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> >
> > We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> > have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
>
> Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not counting viruses
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 20:54, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> >
> > We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> > have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
>
> Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not counting viruses,
> which get blocked before spamassass
How do you get those nice logs? I've been looking for something similar
but haven't find anything yet.
Thank you
Antonio
El lun, 13-10-2003 a las 03:16, landy escribió:
> i cant believe today i have so fat 21% spam
>
>
> File /var/log/mail : from Oct 12 00:05:27 to Oct 12 21:10:54
> Total number
landy a écrit:
File /var/log/mail : from Oct 12 00:05:27 to Oct 12 21:10:54
Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 171
Number of spams :36 ( 21.05%)
Number of clean messages: 135 ( 78.95%)
...
Hello
what script do you use to
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > Given that spammers are now using hijacked machines as HTTP proxy servers,
> > you're more likely to DDOS several dozen poor schmucks' home cable modem
>
> No... I think you missed something here. If the spam was hawking the "ABC
> Corp. wrinkle removal
Jack Gostl Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 11:38 PM:
> We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
Some quick queries of my logfile database say we're at over 75%. Most of you
are lucky. I'm sure there are some among u
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> > By the way, there is an interesting article on "fighting back" by Paul
> > Graham called "Filters That Fight Back."
> >
> > http://www.paulgraham.com/ffb.html
> >
> > He basically suggests culling URLs
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:24:27AM -0400, Scott Blomquist wrote:
>
>
> Simon Byrnand wrote:
>
> >>We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> >>have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
> >
> >
> > Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not cou
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
> By the way, there is an interesting article on "fighting back" by Paul
> Graham called "Filters That Fight Back."
>
> http://www.paulgraham.com/ffb.html
>
> He basically suggests culling URLs from spam and kicking off something
> like wget to retri
Simon Byrnand wrote:
We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not counting viruses,
which get blocked before spamassassin even runs.
Kinda makes you wonder where
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Jack Gostl Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:15 AM
>
> > All of which makes me wonder exactly who is motivated to fix this mess. I
> > suppose that any day now someone will say that spam is the engine of
> > economic recovery. (G)
>
> _We_ are. The
Jack Gostl Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 8:15 AM
> All of which makes me wonder exactly who is motivated to fix this mess. I
> suppose that any day now someone will say that spam is the engine of
> economic recovery. (G)
_We_ are. The more people that we can get to implement this sort of
filteri
> Kinda makes you wonder where the world is heading when more
> email is junk than legitimate :/
>
I see the email world heading towards secure email. A world where you cannot
send an email until/unless your mailer software has a key installed that
validates all mail leaving your site. If you re
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> >
> > We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> > have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
>
> Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not counting viruses,
> which get blocked before spamassassin even
>
> We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
> have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
Our current stats are 57% Spam, 43% ham. And thats not counting viruses,
which get blocked before spamassassin even runs.
Kinda makes you wonder where the world is headi
We run around 50%. And that's by count. With the MS worms flying in we
have noticably more spam by volume than real mail.
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, landy wrote:
> i cant believe today i have so fat 21% spam
>
>
> File /var/log/mail : from Oct 12 00:05:27 to Oct 12 21:10:54
> Total number of emails
i cant believe today i have so fat 21% spam
File /var/log/mail : from Oct 12 00:05:27 to Oct 12 21:10:54
Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 171
Number of spams :36 ( 21.05%)
Number of clean messages: 135 ( 78.95%)
Average me
20 matches
Mail list logo
