On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Michael Moncur wrote:
> score LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.315
> score LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.217
> score LINES_OF_YELLING 0.212
>
> Scores this low indicate that all three LINES_OF_YELLING rules have become
> pretty worthless in detecting spam.
I
> 1. Why does the third line of yelling account for a negative score? It's
> quite common for UCE to have multiply lines in ALLCAPS.
The scores are calculated using a genetic algorithm (GA) that analyzes a
huge corpus of spam and nonspam messages, and it probably found some overall
benefit in redu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
1. Why does the third line of yelling account for a negative score? It's
quite common for UCE to have multiply lines in ALLCAPS.
2. I don't think that auto_report (to Vazor) is a good feature because
anything that can be automatically spotted
