Re: [SAtalk] VCF attachments

2002-10-17 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Danita Zanre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone ever see true Spam that contains VCFs as attachments? I have one. My S/O ratio would be about 0.053. Not as good as I would want in a compensation rule, but almost. Dan --- This sf.net

[SAtalk] VCF attachments

2002-10-16 Thread Danita Zanre
Does anyone ever see true Spam that contains VCFs as attachments? I haven't seen any yet, but I have had email flagged as spam with VCFs just due to "spammish" stuff in the message. I'm wondering if this might not be another possible "offsetting" value to think about. Just a thought way too ear