On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, John Sickles wrote:
Another thing that I noticed about the headers is that the "Received"
headers are missing "for username" entries and have "id XX" instead. I
have edited these headers to show what I mean. I am wondering how is this mail
being sent that these are
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:14:07PM -0500, John Sickles wrote:
> > test USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO is triggered. But he is not listed in local.cf
> > (or any files in /usr/share/spamassassin) in a "all_spam_to" entry. When I
> > run this mail by hand with "s
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:14:07PM -0500, John Sickles wrote:
> test USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO is triggered. But he is not listed in local.cf
> (or any files in /usr/share/spamassassin) in a "all_spam_to" entry. When I
> run this mail by hand with "spamassassin -D < mail" there is no hit for
> USER_IN_AL
Hi,
This user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" keeps getting spam because the
test USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO is triggered. But he is not listed in local.cf
(or any files in /usr/share/spamassassin) in a "all_spam_to" entry. When I
run this mail by hand with "spamassassin -D < mail" there is no hit for
USER_IN_ALL_SPA
