>With a score as small as -0.036 the GA is giving more of a statement that
>this rule isn't much of an indicator of anything at all.
Just wondering, when runninh GA, would it be possible to make it a 2
step process, first step let it run without constraint, and on the
second setp force the nearl
With a score as small as -0.036 the GA is giving more of a statement that
this rule isn't much of an indicator of anything at all.
I'd agree with the original poster, almost anything coming out of the GA
with a score between 0.05 and -0.05 is probably not worth running.
Ultimately it is contri
Shane Williams said:
> I came across an email today that made me think the PROFITS rule
> should be:
> /\bPROFITS/ instead if /PROFITS?
> For instance, NONPROFITS would seem to be more likely to be legitimate
> email. (Two such messages were delivered to users today)
Yes, it should be, no quest
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:57:11PM -0500, Shane Williams wrote:
>
> Also, if a single line of yelling scores -0.036, why not just round
> it off to 0 and not have the test run at all?
Because a single line of yelling seems to be a sign of a legitimate mail
and thus is worth substracting some poi
I came across an email today that made me think the PROFITS rule
should be:
/\bPROFITS/ instead if /PROFITS?
For instance, NONPROFITS would seem to be more likely to be legitimate
email. (Two such messages were delivered to users today)
Also, if a single line of yelling scores -0.036, why not
