On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 22:02, Craig Hughes wrote:
> For the envelope TO, there seem to be 2 "standards", depending on when
> the info is added to the message header. One is added on SMTP-reception
> (such as with exim I think), in which case the header used is
> "Envelope-To".
Actually any head
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 03:51:05PM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
>
> So ... perhaps we should support both. Envelope-To (which can have
> multiple addresses in it, remember) for folks who can use it, and
> Delivered-To for folks who can't. Simple enough.
>
> The nice thing about doing it with head
On 17 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> So, for envelope from checking, we should use the "Return-Path" header.
> I'll make a rule which compares Return-Path to From: and see how it does
> at differentiating spam from nonspam.
Hadn't even thought of checking the sender - interesting. I'm curious t
Ok, I did a little bit of searching:
For the envelope FROM, RFC-1123 specifies that the mail server making
"final delivery" of a message:
MUST pass the MAIL FROM: address from the SMTP envelope
with the message, for use if an error notification message must
be
OK, this isn't something that everyone will be able to use, but it works
nicely for me.
I'm using the courier maildrop LDA. I deliver messages to one recipient at
a time. In maildrop, I've added this:
# Stick the final recipient into the headers
exception {
xfilter "/usr/local/bin/reform
