At 04:58 PM 8/4/2003 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
>Theoretically Theo Van Dinter fixed this a long time ago in this bug:
>
>http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1475
>
>But looking at the code, the fix isn't in 2.43, 2.44, 2.50, 2.52, 2.54 or
>2.55.
it is in 2.60 though ;)
Ouch.. it's bee
Matt Kettler writes:
>At 03:49 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
>>Hello,
>>I noticed an issue with 2.55 and the test for FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,
>>The reverse dns for juno customers is: untd.com
>>This causes a false positive for juno customers.
>>Thanks,
>
>Theoretically Theo Van Dinter fixed
At 03:49 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
Hello,
I noticed an issue with 2.55 and the test for FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,
The reverse dns for juno customers is: untd.com
This causes a false positive for juno customers.
Thanks,
Theoretically Theo Van Dinter fixed this a long time ago in this bug:
Fred I-IS.COM writes:
> Hello,
> I noticed an issue with 2.55 and the test for FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,
> The reverse dns for juno customers is: untd.com
> This causes a false positive for juno customers.
Yeah, I think we have that fixed in 2.60.
--j.
Hello,
I noticed an issue with 2.55 and the test for
FORGED_JUNO_RCVD,
The reverse dns for juno customers is: untd.com
This causes a false positive for juno customers.
Thanks,
Frederic TaraseviciusInternet Information Services, Inc.http://www.i-is.com/
