That will teach me to RTFM.
Thanks.
Brad
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Why not change your domain whitelist to a whitelist_from_rcvd command,
> instead of whitelist_from.
>
> You'll avoid the forgery problem outright.
---
The
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Hazledine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 4:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Surprise mail from myself
>
>
>
> Has anyone written a rule that catches mail supposedly sent
At 04:27 PM 1/21/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
If you bring in more context, rather than use whitelist_from_rcvd, he
wrote his own rule.
Sorry, not reading carefully enough.
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications
---
The SF.Net email is sponsor
At 06:56 PM 1/21/2004, Kelson Vibber wrote:
I suspect he did:
>At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
>>However, the rule seems to pick up the "by fargo.caledoncard.com" in the
>>header and thinks that all is well.
No, he did not use whitelist_from_rcvd.
If you bring in more context, rather
At 02:53 PM 1/21/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
Why not change your domain whitelist to a whitelist_from_rcvd command,
instead of whitelist_from.
I suspect he did:
At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
However, the rule seems to pick up the "by fargo.caledoncard.com" in the
header and thinks th
Why not change your domain whitelist to a whitelist_from_rcvd command,
instead of whitelist_from.
You'll avoid the forgery problem outright.
At 04:43 PM 1/21/2004, Brad Hazledine wrote:
Has anyone written a rule that catches mail supposedly sent by yourself to
yourself?
Example here...
Receive
Has anyone written a rule that catches mail supposedly sent by yourself to
yourself?
Example here...
Received: from WIN-SYEZX91ADBP ([61.50.222.200])
by fargo.caledoncard.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id
i0L6pDT5006761
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 01:51:14
-0500
Me
