Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 10000, spamd relay

2003-07-11 Thread Paul Davies
Not a problem, we have a nuclear power station on-site... From: Kristian Koehntopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Paul Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 1, spamd relay Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2

Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 10000, spamd relay

2003-07-09 Thread Kristian Koehntopp
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:48:20PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote: > >Quite soon, I could possibly be inheriting a spare Enterprise 1 > >(possibly fully loaded, i.e. 64processors etc...), for use with > >spamassassin. > > Ok, dude. You totally win the "What hardware do YOU run SpamAssassin

RE: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 10000, spamd relay

2003-07-09 Thread Marek Dohojda
Ahm Like WOW!!! :) -Original Message- From: Jonathan Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:48 PM To: Paul Davies Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Davies wrote: > Hello All, > > Quite soon, I could possibly be inheriting a spare Enterprise 1 > (possibly

Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 10000, spamd relay

2003-07-09 Thread Jonathan Nichols
Paul Davies wrote: Hello All, Quite soon, I could possibly be inheriting a spare Enterprise 1 (possibly fully loaded, i.e. 64processors etc...), for use with spamassassin. Ok, dude. You totally win the "What hardware do YOU run SpamAssassin on?" contest. By far. ;) Beats out my lowly 700

[SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 10000, spamd relay

2003-07-08 Thread Paul Davies
Hello All, Quite soon, I could possibly be inheriting a spare Enterprise 1 (possibly fully loaded, i.e. 64processors etc...), for use with spamassassin. I am looking for a highly documented and maintained procedure for implementing spamassassin with Solaris 8/9, which relays (no mailboxes