John Rudd wrote:
Along those lines, it'd be nice to define things which are like
whitelists and blacklists, but have separate lists and separate scores.
So, like, I might have:
addlist white to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # same as whitelist_to
addlist black from [EMAIL PROTECTED] # same as blackli
To give maximum flexibility, you could add these lines to the 4 you listed
score whitelist -100
score blacklist +10
score blocklist + 100
score graylist -10
score greenlist -5
At 12:35 PM 11/25/2002 -0800, John Rudd wrote:
Along those lines, it'd be nice to define things which are like white
Along those lines, it'd be nice to define things which are like
whitelists and blacklists, but have separate lists and separate scores.
So, like, I might have:
addlist white to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # same as whitelist_to
addlist black from [EMAIL PROTECTED] # same as blacklist_from
addlist bl
This would work well most of the time, but I have been getting spam with
the return address of others on my domain to whom I regularly send
mail. That is, the spammers are trolling their address database and using
people I likely know as the return address. Your scheme would let these
message
* Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So if I have an entry like (/etc/postfix/main.cf):
>
> mailbox_command = procmail -a "$EXTENSION"
This is only for local delivery via "local"
> just add one like:
> content_filter = procmail -a "$EXTENSION"
This is for all mail in transit.
Note: The above
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
How do you use procmail to filter outbound email?
If you're using Postfix, you can use a content_filter that invokes
procmail.
So if I have an entry like (/etc/postfix/main.cf):
mailbox_command = procmail -a "$EXTENSION"
just ad
* Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How do you use procmail to filter outbound email?
If you're using Postfix, you can use a content_filter that invokes
procmail.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite Campus MitteTel. +49 (0)3
Steve Evans said:
> Keep a database with every address that e-mail is sent to. Have a rule
> with a negative value that checks that database on incoming mail.
>
> I find it quite unlikely that any address that someone would send a
> message to would ever be sending my server spam. Any thoughts?
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 the voices made John Rudd write:
1) Have your mail client put a copy of all outgoing messages into a
particular folder (like "Sent"). (most clients do this already, so its
no big deal)
2) Write a program which parses that file out and adds those add
but the point isn't to be perfect here. Just get the
highest majority possible.
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
(619) 594-0653
-Original Message-
From: Steve Evans
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 8:29 PM
To: SpamAssasin Mailing List
Subject: [SAtalk] Suggestion to Reduce False Positiv
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 the voices made Jeremy Zawodny write:
> Well, it's not *trivial* but I don't think it's huge either. You need
> to scan all outgoing mail and maintain a list of destination
> addresses. Then integrate that into a site-wide SA whitelist.
>
> Am I missing some complexity?
Wel
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 the voices made John Rudd write:
> 1) Have your mail client put a copy of all outgoing messages into a
> particular folder (like "Sent"). (most clients do this already, so its
> no big deal)
>
> 2) Write a program which parses that file out and adds those addresses
> to a file,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 06:59:14AM +0100, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 the voices made Steve Evans write:
>
> > Keep a database with every address that e-mail is sent to. Have a rule
> > with a negative value that checks that database on incoming mail.
> >
> > I find it quite un
On Sunday, Nov 24, 2002, at 21:59 US/Pacific, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 the voices made Steve Evans write:
Keep a database with every address that e-mail is sent to. Have a
rule
with a negative value that checks that database on incoming mail.
I find it quite unlikely tha
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002 the voices made Steve Evans write:
> Keep a database with every address that e-mail is sent to. Have a rule
> with a negative value that checks that database on incoming mail.
>
> I find it quite unlikely that any address that someone would send a
> message to would ever be se
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:29:28PM -0800, Steve Evans wrote:
> Keep a database with every address that e-mail is sent to. Have a rule
> with a negative value that checks that database on incoming mail.
>
> I find it quite unlikely that any address that someone would send a
> message to would ever
Keep a database with every address that e-mail is sent to. Have a rule
with a negative value that checks that database on incoming mail.
I find it quite unlikely that any address that someone would send a
message to would ever be sending my server spam. Any thoughts?
Steve Evans
SDSU Foundation
17 matches
Mail list logo
