RE: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-21 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, December 21, 2002 2:07 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Theo Van Dinter said: > >> $ tr 'n-za-m' 'a-z' >> zvxr^nfpraqrapl(arg >> mike^ascendency(net >> >> It's probably used for spamcop reports and the like. E

Re: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-21 Thread Justin Mason
Theo Van Dinter said: > $ tr 'n-za-m' 'a-z' > zvxr^nfpraqrapl(arg > mike^ascendency(net > > It's probably used for spamcop reports and the like. Even if you clean > out your email address, you'll probably skip that header. > > Turns out a number of the unique ids in the message body do this ki

RE: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, December 20, 2002 10:02 PM Theo Van Dinter wrote: > I don't think there's a "foreground/background is the same" test in > 2.50, but there are a bunch of HTML-related rules, they check for > things like the rat

Re: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Brian May
To: "'Theo Van Dinter'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:21 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > -Original Message- >

Re: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:21:57PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > I see. Ok, well, what about the actual message; the fact that it's blank and that >it isn't being picked up by SA? Doesn't SA have a rule for white text on white >background? Well, the copy that you posted before was munged, so

RE: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > -Original Message- > What to do about it? Nothing? I personally don't see it as important > enough to do anything about. I see. Ok, well, what about the actual message; the fact that it's blank and that it isn't being picked up by SA?

Re: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:34:34PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > I don't get it. Why would they put my "encrypted" email address in some strange >header? Is it to add "noise" so that traditional filters won't catch it? The bigger >question: what the heck do I do about this? It's "personalize

RE: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:32 PM > To: Mike Loiterman > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body > &

Re: [SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:11:04PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > X-Rot-Version: zvxr^nfpraqrapl(arg > > Two other questions...shouldn't these messages be listed in Razor1, 2 or dcc? Also >I noticed the header X-Rot-Version. What is that? That seems to be a common element. Congrats, you've be

[SAtalk] Subject with blank (hidden) body

2002-12-20 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I seem to be getting a lot of messages with just a Subject and a blank body, or what appears to be a blank body. If you look at the message in Outlook nothing appears in the body, but I have a utility that lets you view the html as well, in ther