Re: [SAtalk] Strangely bad call

2002-04-03 Thread Craig Hughes
Yes, please do. C On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 06:37, Gregor Lawatscheck wrote: > At 06:49 03/04/2002, you wrote: > >Also, this is the second legitimate e-mail that came to me in the last > >couple of days through osirusoft and was rejected. > > This is because of the RBL checking mechanism. It check

Re: [SAtalk] Strangely bad call

2002-04-03 Thread Craig Hughes
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 20:49, Marsha Hanchrow wrote: > I had sent a question form to a company that manufactures ventilating > equipment, and the reply was caught as spam. I've included only a small > portion of the pdf attachment that probably set the CASHCASHCASH, but I > noticed no consecuti

Re: [SAtalk] Strangely bad call

2002-04-03 Thread Gregor Lawatscheck
At 06:49 03/04/2002, you wrote: >Also, this is the second legitimate e-mail that came to me in the last >couple of days through osirusoft and was rejected. This is because of the RBL checking mechanism. It checks the last two relay stages, the last is probably dialup and gets flagged by osiru..

[SAtalk] Strangely bad call

2002-04-03 Thread Marsha Hanchrow
I had sent a question form to a company that manufactures ventilating equipment, and the reply was caught as spam.  I've included only a small portion of the pdf attachment that probably set the CASHCASHCASH, but I noticed no consecutive dollar signs.  As far as I can tell, there is *nothing* that