> -Original Message-
> From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:36 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; Dallas L. Engelken;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject Header (RESULTS)
>
>
however, if you look for a word to start with BS, and someone emails a
"check out this bs" then...you could have problems...
Adam Schneider wrote:
On 12/31/03, Casper Gasper wrote:
Things like, '4 consonants in a row are not an English word'.
Shortstop? Matchstick? :)
Seriously, thoug
Building on Adam's perl script, this rendition will print the words it
sees which begin with rare tuples.
my (@rare_tuples) = qw/bb bc bd bf bg bh bj bk bm bn bp bq bs bt bv bw bx bz
cb cc cd cf cg cj ck cm cn cp cq cs ct cv cw cx
db dc dd df dg dj dk dl dm dn dp dq ds dt dv dx dz
eh ez
fb fc fd
On 12/31/03, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
>
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:04:45 -0600, Adam Schneider wrote:
>
>> DUBIOUS WORD BEGINNINGS:
>
>One problem with this is of course acronyms and names (lots of english writing people
>have non english names, and names of products (especially software) often include
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:04:45 -0600, Adam Schneider wrote:
> DUBIOUS WORD BEGINNINGS:
One problem with this is of course acronyms and names (lots of english writing people
have non english names, and names of products (especially software) often includes
acronym).
"WMWare" for example would ha
On 12/31/03, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>Don't go crazy! Wait a little longer. A LOT of work has already been done.
>Soon. Very soon ;)
I didn't go crazy; it really did just take a few minutes. Using the word list from an
anagram-generating program, here's what I came up with. Maybe someone will f
ent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject Header (RESULTS)
>
>
>
>
> On 12/31/03, Casper Gasper wrote:
> >
> >Things like, '4 consonants in a row are not an English word'.
>
>
Rumor has it that Jennifer Wheeler may have mentioned these words:
> On 12/31/03, Casper Gasper wrote:
> >
> >Things like, '4 consonants in a row are not an English word'.
>
> Shortstop? Matchstick? :)
>
> Seriously, though, looking for patterns is an interesting idea. For
> instance, English si
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:06 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject Header (RESULTS)
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 12:02:50PM -0600, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> spell checking hurts obfu because splitting a correctly spelled word
> with a word boundary will cause 2 or more mis spelled words...
>
> Subject: looking for xa/nax,
>
> looking: ok
> for: ok
> xa: not found
> nax: not found
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:13 AM
> To: 'Fred'; Dallas L. Engelken;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject Header (RESULTS)
>
>
> LO
> On 12/31/03, Casper Gasper wrote:
> >
> >Things like, '4 consonants in a row are not an English word'.
>
> Shortstop? Matchstick? :)
>
> Seriously, though, looking for patterns is an interesting idea. For
> instance, English simply does not allow you to begin a word with "vt"
or
> "bs". Loo
On 12/31/03, Casper Gasper wrote:
>
>Things like, '4 consonants in a row are not an English word'.
Shortstop? Matchstick? :)
Seriously, though, looking for patterns is an interesting idea. For instance, English
simply does not allow you to begin a word with "vt" or "bs". Looking for word
I'm just talking off the top of my head here, but rather than running
words through a spell checker can't you make a linguistic analysis by
say, measuring the position of vowels in the word? I'm not sure
exactly how you'd measure that, but I'm prepared to bet that some
linguist has done resear
.
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 6:36 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; 'Dallas L. Engelken';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject He
Chris Santerre wrote:
> WOW!!! Nice work!!
>
> Thanks for sharing the results!! We can put that whole spellcheck
> thing to rest now ;)
>
> --Chris
I won't let this die yet, I have a few ideas to play with, and more when I
get more time to look at some ham subjects which could cause these
results
CTED]
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject Header (RESULTS)
>>
>>
>> WOW!!! Nice work!!
>>
>
> thank you
>
>> How did it handle things not found in the dictionary? Like
>> LFHDJFHFJ$*? I didn&#x
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 3:42 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject Header (RESULTS)
>
>
> WOW!!
spellcheck thing to
rest now ;)
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 2:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spell Checking the Subject Header (RESULTS)
&g
i've seen alot of junk lately that is severly mis-spelled in the
subject...
Subject: cheeap sooftware avaailable ! lpvapvcijv
Subject: Dallase would you pllease just listten to me
So... i hacked up an eval test to call pspell on the subject line of
each message here are the results running
20 matches
Mail list logo
