Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
>>2. Use an external mail class to parse your email and split out just the
>>text and html parts to pass to SpamAssassin. A huge part of the load on
>>SA is in doing nasty slow regexps across the "rawbody" tests when the
>>email contains large MIME attachments.
>
>
> Do y
> 2. Use an external mail class to parse your email and split out just the
> text and html parts to pass to SpamAssassin. A huge part of the load on
> SA is in doing nasty slow regexps across the "rawbody" tests when the
> email contains large MIME attachments.
Do you have a document giving an ex
Justin Robinson wrote:
> Hi all, I just barely subscribed to the list and I have a question...
>
>
> We did a bit of an experiment in using SpamAssassin over the past month
> and just disabled it last night. We have roughly 9000 email accounts on
> our server and we mass-enabled spam assass
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 12:39, Justin Robinson wrote:
> We are running FreeBSD 4.3-Release, sendmail 8.12.2, procmail 3.15.1, and
> spamassassin 2.11
Some of the bugs that have been reported and fixed since 2.11 had to do
with rules with regexps that took really long times at high loads on
some inp
We are not using Razor, so I do not believe it should be an issue with that.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Justin Robinson; spamtalk (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue
On Thu
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:49:26PM -0700, Daniel Rogers wrote:
> Were you using spamc/spamd?
For a few days there, Razor was responding very slowly. Have you
optimized the SA configuration to do only local checks? With enough
waiting around for something like Razor, your load would go up
signif
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:39:44PM -0400, Justin Robinson wrote:
> We did a bit of an experiment in using SpamAssassin over the past month and
> just disabled it last night. We have roughly 9000 email accounts on our
> server and we mass-enabled spam assassin for them. Only 78 used the opt-out
>
Hi all, I just
barely subscribed to the list and I have a question...
We did a bit of an
experiment in using SpamAssassin over the past month and just disabled it last
night. We have roughly 9000 email accounts on our server and we
mass-enabled spam assassin for them. Only 78 used the