Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-17 Thread Matt Sergeant
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: >>2. Use an external mail class to parse your email and split out just the >>text and html parts to pass to SpamAssassin. A huge part of the load on >>SA is in doing nasty slow regexps across the "rawbody" tests when the >>email contains large MIME attachments. > > > Do y

Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-17 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> 2. Use an external mail class to parse your email and split out just the > text and html parts to pass to SpamAssassin. A huge part of the load on > SA is in doing nasty slow regexps across the "rawbody" tests when the > email contains large MIME attachments. Do you have a document giving an ex

Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-17 Thread Matt Sergeant
Justin Robinson wrote: > Hi all, I just barely subscribed to the list and I have a question... > > > We did a bit of an experiment in using SpamAssassin over the past month > and just disabled it last night. We have roughly 9000 email accounts on > our server and we mass-enabled spam assass

Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-16 Thread Sidney Markowitz
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 12:39, Justin Robinson wrote: > We are running FreeBSD 4.3-Release, sendmail 8.12.2, procmail 3.15.1, and > spamassassin 2.11 Some of the bugs that have been reported and fixed since 2.11 had to do with rules with regexps that took really long times at high loads on some inp

RE: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-16 Thread Justin Robinson
We are not using Razor, so I do not believe it should be an issue with that. Justin -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:55 PM To: Justin Robinson; spamtalk (E-mail) Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue On Thu

Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-16 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:49:26PM -0700, Daniel Rogers wrote: > Were you using spamc/spamd? For a few days there, Razor was responding very slowly. Have you optimized the SA configuration to do only local checks? With enough waiting around for something like Razor, your load would go up signif

Re: [SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-16 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:39:44PM -0400, Justin Robinson wrote: > We did a bit of an experiment in using SpamAssassin over the past month and > just disabled it last night. We have roughly 9000 email accounts on our > server and we mass-enabled spam assassin for them. Only 78 used the opt-out >

[SAtalk] Speed/Performance Issue

2002-05-16 Thread Justin Robinson
Hi all, I just barely subscribed to the list and I have a question...     We did a bit of an experiment in using SpamAssassin over the past month and just disabled it last night.  We have roughly 9000 email accounts on our server and we mass-enabled spam assassin for them.  Only 78 used the