-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Saturday, 2. March 2002 23:32 schrieb Daniel Quinlan:
> > I think the idea with GAPPY_TEXT is to catch these things. I
> > suspect it's not working right though.
> Why not strip out all non-letters and then do matching for things like
> the "remov
Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the idea with GAPPY_TEXT is to catch these things. I
> suspect it's not working right though.
Why not strip out all non-letters and then do matching for things like
the "remove" rules?
take this:
+++
I think the idea with GAPPY_TEXT is to catch these things. I suspect it's not
working right though.
C
Martin Bene wrote:
> Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:22:40 +0100
> From: Martin Bene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spammers tr
> (none of the "remove" rules triggered)
True, but gappy text should have been triggered. Maybe we need a gappy
remove-specific test, because there's a lot of nonspam gappy text out there
Regards,
Andrew
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
spammers are obviously trying to evade SA rules, have a look at this as an example:
If you wish to be "r e m o v e d" -of f our - l-i- s-t,
ple ase em ail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or a
