On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> What can be done to plug this hole?
I think that the goal here is to not add invisible
words to the bayesian database.
Step one is to detect which words are invisible.
You could simply look for white words, but the next
thing y
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:59:42 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed recently that spam is starting to creep through the cracks of
> SA. I looked at one of them, and it seems this spammer is trying to foil
> the spam-filters, especially Bayes.
>
> The spam mess
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> eutectic scarf tailing identifiable corresponded
Whenever I've seen this, it's looke like:
eutectic scarf tailing identifiable corresponded
ie -- opening a font over and over. I wrote a simple procmail rule to catch
that:
:0 B
* <1
* ^^$?$?
I've noticed recently that spam is starting to creep through the cracks of
SA. I looked at one of them, and it seems this spammer is trying to foil
the spam-filters, especially Bayes.
The spam message contains a large number of dictionary words written in
HTML in WHITE, so they don't appear on the
