Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

2003-05-31 Thread Michael Stauber
Hi Tom, > We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became > severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. [...] In each > case, we had around 150 spamd processes running, with 2.5 GB of swap in use > on a machine with 250 MB of memory! > > Each time I noticed th

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

2003-05-31 Thread Thomas Schulz
> From: Tony Earnshaw > > > We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became > > severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. One was on the > > 21st when dorkslayers.com went down. The other was yesterday for no > > apparent reason. In each case, we had a

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

2003-05-30 Thread Tony Earnshaw
tor, 29.05.2003 kl. 20.44 skrev Thomas Schulz: > We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became > severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. One was on the > 21st when dorkslayers.com went down. The other was yesterday for no > apparent reason. In each case

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

2003-05-30 Thread Thomas Schulz
> From: "Christopher Meiklejohn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Thomas Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit > Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:24:56 -0400 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2

[SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

2003-05-30 Thread Thomas Schulz
We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. One was on the 21st when dorkslayers.com went down. The other was yesterday for no apparent reason. In each case, we had around 150 spamd processes running, with 2.5 GB