> I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc
>
> I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections
> per second.
> I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even
> bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server.
>
> The server is Pentium III 1 g
I dunno. I've had mine turned off forever and I've had ZERO FNs since
upgrading to 2.60 and dumping about 200 messages through sa-learn.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Brian Morrison wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A.
> Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A.
Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few things I can recommend that speed things up:
>
> 1) Turn off RBL lookups
How much additional spam did you want to have to look at?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot u
We are receiving near this much mail traffic, I get about 1 connection every
2 seconds, average of 50k messages per day.
I am using spamD on 3 different servers to spread the load around, it's
working great!
In am also running my own creation (WinSpamC) which allows for
load-balancing between mul
I am running 2.6 on a P4-2.4GHz that gets about 1/3 that amount of traffic
and most of my analyses are completed in under .25 seconds. The box is
running RH9.0 and using postfix to call procmail.
A few things I can recommend that speed things up:
1) Turn off RBL lookups
2) Run a local cachin
I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc
I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections
per second.
I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even
bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server.
The server is Pentium III 1 ghz, 512 MB ram.
