Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:47:15PM -0600, dman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:11:19PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote: > | On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:00:12PM -0500, Craig Hughes wrote: > | > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > | > > One thing to beware of is that Perl will *nev

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this: > On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 16:31, Sean Rima wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay yowled: >> >> > Are you using a Pentium 100 with 40 MB RAM? >> >> No a P90 with 32mb :) > > Would that be one-downsman

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay told this: >> >> It is strange, I use fetchmail with exim and have never suffered this >> >> problem. During some of my big runs (400+ emails) spamd works fine. I >> >> had the problem but have noticed that as soon

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Craig Hughes
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 16:31, Sean Rima wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay yowled: > > > Are you using a Pentium 100 with 40 MB RAM? > > No a P90 with 32mb :) Would that be one-downsmanship? C ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:31:32AM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay yowled: > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On 02 Ap

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay yowled: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 02 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes spake thusly: >> >> > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 17:11, Duncan

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes spake thusly: > > > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 17:11, Duncan Findlay wrote: > >> The only problems come when you get "spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn- > >>

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told this: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:11:19PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote: >| On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:00:12PM -0500, Craig Hughes wrote: >| > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote: > >| > > One t

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes spake thusly: > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 17:11, Duncan Findlay wrote: >> The only problems come when you get "spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn- >> spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn- >

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-03 Thread dman
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:11:19PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote: | On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:00:12PM -0500, Craig Hughes wrote: | > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote: | > > One thing to beware of is that Perl will *never* free memory back to the | > > OS. Ever. | > | > That shoul

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-02 Thread Craig Hughes
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 17:11, Duncan Findlay wrote: > The only problems come when you get "spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn- > spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn- > spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-spawn-crash-and-burn" as > soon as fetchmail k

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-02 Thread Duncan Findlay
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:00:12PM -0500, Craig Hughes wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > AHA Lists wrote: > > > I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory. > > > IS this normal? > > > > > > root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-02 Thread Craig Hughes
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 04:27, Matt Sergeant wrote: > AHA Lists wrote: > > I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory. > > IS this normal? > > > > root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S08:44 0:00 perl > > /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a > > > > This is Perl. It

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-04-02 Thread Matt Sergeant
AHA Lists wrote: > I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory. > IS this normal? > > root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S08:44 0:00 perl > /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a > This is Perl. It trades memory for speed. Yes, that's perfectly normal. One thing t

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-03-29 Thread Craig Hughes
root 3002 0.0 0.5 10364 8924 ?SMar19 0:04 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd -D -d -L -c -a -F0 It's allocated 10364k on my machine, of which after 10 days uptime 8924 is resident in core, being around 0.5% of my 1.5GB -- this seems to be about normal. What's taking up memory i

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-03-29 Thread dman
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:06:29AM -0600, AHA Lists wrote: | My % = 6.8 megs. That just seems really high while sitting there doing | nothing but waiting. If you rewrite it in C, then perhaps (depends on the source of memory usage and your coding skills) it would use less memory. I think much o

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-03-29 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > > My % = 6.8 megs. That just seems really high while sitting there doing > nothing but waiting. > > > I see that you are using AWL. How large is your db? This may be what is using alot of your RAM. My AWL db is about 16MB. --- Ed. ___ Spamass

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-03-29 Thread AHA Lists
My % = 6.8 megs. That just seems really high while sitting there doing nothing but waiting. on 3/29/02 8:50 AM, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Percentage is relative but on my box spamd is currently using 8.8MB of RAM. > Got this from top. > > >> >> >> I am runn

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-03-29 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
Percentage is relative but on my box spamd is currently using 8.8MB of RAM. Got this from top. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of AHA > Lists > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Su

[SAtalk] Spamd and memory

2002-03-29 Thread AHA Lists
I am running spamd on my redhat 6 box and spamd is taking up 5.3% memory. IS this normal? root 3401 0.0 5.3 7848 6792 ?S08:44 0:00 perl /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a Thanks. ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https:/