;
> I have the following line in my fstab:
>
> tmpfs /var/spool/filter tmpfs size=100M 0 0
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Network
> Admin
> Sent: 15 December 2003 22:33
>
-Original Message-
Yep, it got me this time around too! The test ran very fast, but in actual
operation I'm running around 10 secs per message.
Does anyone know the string to create a virtual ram drive using FreeBSD? I'm
Just my $0.02 on tmpfs... I stopped using them years ago because th
t: 15 December 2003 22:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!
Yep, it got me this time around too! The test ran very fast, but in actual
operation I'm running around 10 secs per message.
Does anyone know the string to create a virtual ram drive using FreeBSD?
Yep, it got me this time around too! The test ran very fast, but in actual
operation I'm running around 10 secs per message.
Does anyone know the string to create a virtual ram drive using FreeBSD? I'm
sure tempted to see if running /var/spool/spamassassin/tmp might help, so I
don't have to g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Mike Vanecek" writes:
>On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:30:09 -0800, Justin Mason wrote
>
>[snip]
>
>> >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569
>>
>> Missed that one; I've just set it to be fixed for 2.62. It seems pretty
>> complex; either the
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:30:09 -0800, Justin Mason wrote
[snip]
> >http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569
>
> Missed that one; I've just set it to be fixed for 2.62. It seems pretty
> complex; either there's several failure cases, or nobody has yet done
> enough diagnosis to get to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vivek Khera writes:
>Great news...
>
>Any idea on how a rather nasty bug can be addressed before the next
>release? I had hoped it would be addressed in 2.61 (I've been away
>from the list for a while so I didn't see the pre-announcements). It
>appa
Great news...
Any idea on how a rather nasty bug can be addressed before the next
release? I had hoped it would be addressed in 2.61 (I've been away
from the list for a while so I didn't see the pre-announcements). It
apparently is affecting a fair number of people aside from myself:
http://bug
--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:12 AM -0500 Charles Gregory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Will RPM's be out soon?
Easy enough to make from the tarball:
rpmbuild -ta xx.tar.gz
This works for any tarball package that includes a specfile.
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:18 AM
> To: Charles Gregory
> Cc: Justin Mason; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 a
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:12:46AM -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> 1) Will RPM's be out soon?
Yes, I'll do up some RPMs soon.
> 2) It sounds like this release is mostly just rule changes.
>Is there yet a mechanism (an easy way) to just update rules without
>going through an 'install' pro
1) Will RPM's be out soon?
OR
2) It sounds like this release is mostly just rule changes.
Is there yet a mechanism (an easy way) to just update rules without
going through an 'install' process?
Thanks for all the hard work!
- Charles
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Justin Mason wrote:
> Downloadi
Downloading
---
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.bz2
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.zip
md5sum:
6521ad3e6ed5a2eba35476c43c1697b7 Mail-SpamAssassin-
13 matches
Mail list logo
