> Justin Mason wrote on Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:18:07 -0700:
>
>> - spamd now supports UNIX-domain sockets for low-overhead scanning,
>> thanks
>> to Steve Friedl for this. Strongly recommended if you're running
>> spamc
>> on the same host as the spamd server
>>
>
> What does this mean, what's th
Malte S. Stretz wrote on Fri, 29 Aug 2003 23:42:15 +0200:
> What does perl -V:prefix say?
>
/usr
So, this is dependant on the perl PREFIX path? That explains why others
get a different path although they don't use a specific PREFIX switch.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web a
Justin Mason wrote on Thu, 28 Aug 2003 17:18:07 -0700:
> - spamd now supports UNIX-domain sockets for low-overhead scanning, thanks
> to Steve Friedl for this. Strongly recommended if you're running spamc
> on the same host as the spamd server
>
What does this mean, what's the advantage of t
Malte S. Stretz wrote on Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:32:52 +0200:
> > Also, for some reason on rc3, perl Makefile.PL built a system that was
> > looking in /usr/local/etc/spamassassin for local.cf instead of in
> > /etc/mail/spamassasin, as previous versions did.
>
> Yeah, this has changed a bit. You ha
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:43:52 -0400 (EDT) "Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> > it's in by default:
> >
> > spamc:
> > -U socketpath
> > Connect to "spamd" via UNIX domain socket socketpath instead of a TCP/IP
> > connection.
>
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> it's in by default:
>
> spamc:
> -U socketpath
> Connect to "spamd" via UNIX domain socket socketpath instead of a TCP/IP connection.
That means any of my users who put spamc in their .procmailrc file has to
know 1) to use a socketpath, and 2) what th
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> Is there a build switch to tell spamc to use a Unix doimain socket (and the
> socket name) by default ?
it's in by default:
spamd:
--socketpath=path Listen on given UNIX domain socket
spamc:
-U socketpat
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Justin Mason wrote:
> - spamd now supports UNIX-domain sockets for low-overhead scanning, thanks
> to Steve Friedl for this. Strongly recommended if you're running spamc
> on the same host as the spamd server
Is there a build switch to tell spamc to use a Unix doimain s
Cool, the make tests now run MUCH faster that either RC1 or RC2, there
seemed to be a problem on my setup that they took over 30 minutes to
complete. Thie time it only took a couple.
Keep up the good work.
Robin Cornelius
---
This sf.net e
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:57:27PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Fixed now, but the second part of Theo's fix (assuming he did it :) doesn't
> seem to be in there - using any \n's to add a newline into a report header
> still effectively disables automatic header folding causing long lines...
Th
At 17:18 28/08/2003 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
- bug 2347: add_header did not support multiple newlines
Fixed now, but the second part of Theo's fix (assuming he did it :) doesn't
seem to be in there - using any \n's to add a newline into a report header
still effectively disables automatic hea
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc3.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc3.zip
md5sums:
141a73b07d46324865ea7ead49375043 Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc3.tar.gz
94f196bfe9301233c848934908cc96ac Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc3.zi
12 matches
Mail list logo
