Steve,
Can you try this patch instead of the one that shipped with rc6 (start
with a clean Razor tree) and see if it fixes the problem for you? It's
a stab in the dark since I don't have this problem, but I found a few
suspect things that weren't being untainted so it's worth a try. I'd
really l
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:53:14PM -0700, Morris Jones wrote:
> I'm seeing the same thing when procmail calls spamc from "nobody". Not sure
> what's going on there, but I haven't looked at the source.
imnsho, it's another issue with razor not being taint safe. I haven't
seen that error at all th
I'm seeing the same thing when procmail calls spamc from "nobody". Not sure
what's going on there, but I haven't looked at the source.
Mojo
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Steve Thomas wrote:
> I just installed this and am now seeing this in the logs when Razor2 is called (yes,
> I patched razor [2.36] b
I just installed this and am now seeing this in the logs when Razor2 is called (yes, I
patched razor [2.36] before compiling):
razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in connect while running
setuid at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 108.
I wasn't getting
Pick it up from:
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc6.tar.gz
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc6.tar.bz2
http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc6.zip
md5sum:
ffabc6756210a745475b76bc10c4f1b7 Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc6.tar.
