Re[2]: [SAtalk] Spam that got through question

2003-12-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 07:45 PM 12/8/03 -0800, Robert Menschel wrote: MK> That's definitely bayes poison. Well, it's definitely an attempt at bayes poison, and/or a checksum poison. I used to treat it as bayes poison, and keep those out of my bayes database. I no longer bother. To me it's become bayes fodder. Well, g

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Spam that got through question

2003-12-08 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Matt, Sunday, December 7, 2003, 8:46:16 PM, you wrote: MK> At 07:15 PM 12/7/03 -0800, Scott Harris wrote: >>The spam attached has the following random words at the bottom: >> >>automata childhood reflectance trevelyan tile captious hollingsworth >>cornstarch chinaman chicanery >> >>Is this

Re: [SAtalk] Spam that got through question

2003-12-07 Thread Matt Kettler
At 07:15 PM 12/7/03 -0800, Scott Harris wrote: The spam attached has the following random words at the bottom: automata childhood reflectance trevelyan tile captious hollingsworth cornstarch chinaman chicanery Is this to try to poison bayes or to just try and fool things to get it through or so

[SAtalk] Spam that got through question

2003-12-07 Thread Scott Harris
Title: Spam that got through question The spam attached has the following random words at the bottom: automata childhood reflectance trevelyan tile captious hollingsworth cornstarch chinaman chicanery Is this to try to poison bayes or to just try and fool things to get it through or some

[SAtalk] Spam that got through

2002-05-13 Thread Jim Scott
Perhaps there would be a way to detect this message better as spam? Jim --- Begin Message --- Title: notepad.gif You are receiving this email from Blue Chip Brands. If you would prefer not to receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe instructions at the b