ugh the SA system. I haven't taken the time yet to look into it, it
seems to happen about 1/1000 of the time.
-Original Message-
From: mikea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam not
On Mon, Sep 22, 200
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:07:06PM -0400, Alicia Forsythe wrote:
> The following spam is making it through. When I test this same mail, it
> scores over 20 points. Why is it still getting through?
>
>
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from 209.118.212.3
> ([200.167.37.247])
The following spam is making it through. When I test this same mail, it
scores over 20 points. Why is it still getting through?
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 209.118.212.3
([200.167.37.247])
by ns1.mshs.com; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:13:40 -0400
Received: from [161
El Mié 16 Oct 2002 11:14, Jose Manuel Macias Luna escribió:
> I realized this morning that some spam is not being tagged by
> SA...
I know why... I'm sorry... spamc man page states:
" Note that the default size is 250k, so if spamc gets handed a
message bigger than this
Hello all,
I realized this morning that some spam is not being tagged by
SA. I tried to report that it is spam with 'spamassassin -r' but I got
an error: "Warning, unable to report spam", perhaps a problem
with my configuration.
What should I do ? It's very str
Well, the particular bug is marked "WONTFIX" because it's not really a bug,
it's an intentional behavior.
Someone was making the argument that SA should only examine the from: line
for whitelists, and that's not practical.
In your case it sounds like you've checked to make sure that both the
From: Arie Slob
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:29 AM
> To: Riley; Justin Mason
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam not tagged, and USER_IN_WHITELIST?
>
> Well, I thought I had a similar problem. Got 2 emails in the last 24 hours
> listing
>
> US
"Riley" said:
> Could some explain this to me? Maybe I'm missing something obvious?
> I can't find any reference to this in my whitelists, but the Status
> is No.
Well, I thought I had a similar problem. Got 2 emails in the last 24 hours
listing
USER_IN_WHITELIST
I found out that:
I had our
"Riley" said:
> Could some explain this to me? Maybe I'm missing something obvious? I
> can't find any reference to this in my whitelists, but the Status is No.
we'd need full headers to be able to diagnose it. those mails are
incomplete... no Received hdrs or Return-Path.
--j.
---
Well, your messages are missing complete headers, so it's hard to say what
the problem is. I'd suggest reading this bugzilla however, then examining
the complete message headers and look at what the return path is.
http://www.hughes-family.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1038
At 05:23 PM 10/9/200
Hi all,
Could some explain this to me? Maybe I'm missing something obvious? I
can't find any reference to this in my whitelists, but the Status is No.
Thanks,
Riley
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
-- Mark Twain
Reply-To: "Surf Faster
11 matches
Mail list logo
