Re: [SAtalk] Spam let in via "raw-body-text per-line regexp tests"

2003-01-10 Thread Greg Owen
Theo Van Dinter wrote: Well, a quick look at the rule matches shows non-standard rules: EBAY_REL_0,EBAY_REL_2,EBAY_REL_3 The rest are standard, so I'd assume these have large negative values. Bingo! That large splat is the sound of egg on my face. I checked all the scores in 50_scores.cf but

Re: [SAtalk] Spam let in via "raw-body-text per-line regexp tests"

2003-01-10 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 07:10:00PM -0500, Greg Owen wrote: > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-281.6 required=5.0 > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-174.7 required=5.0 > > 1) Is this a known bug or known misconfiguration issue? not a bug. these score above 20 for me with 2.43. > 2) If so, how do I fix it? Well

[SAtalk] Spam let in via "raw-body-text per-line regexp tests"

2003-01-10 Thread Greg Owen
With SpamAssassin 2.43 I'm getting some obvious spam get in with very large negative scores. I've attached two such messages; here are their respective scores: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-281.6 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-174.7 required=5.0 Running "SpamAssassin -D" on the messag