RE: [SAtalk] Some rules for scoring Bulk Mailers

2003-11-05 Thread Chris Santerre
I've been using one for PowerMTA for a while. I know it has legit uses, and I've scored it low just for testing. 278 spams / 68 hams MY_POWERMTA out of ~7500 spams. Not that heavy a hitter :( --Chris --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: S

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Some rules for scoring Bulk Mailers

2003-11-05 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Carlos, Wednesday, November 5, 2003, 2:38:29 AM, you wrote: CJS> First of all thanks for your reply. My pleasure. >> I ran your rules against my personal corpus (scores are xx spam / xx >> ham of 43,638 emails in my corpus): CJS> Hummm this

Re: [SAtalk] Some rules for scoring Bulk Mailers

2003-11-05 Thread Carlos Jorge Santos
Hi Robert, First of all thanks for your reply. Robert Menschel wrote: I ran your rules against my personal corpus (scores are xx spam / xx ham of 43,638 emails in my corpus): MAILER_LPI -- 0s/0h of 43638 corpus MAILER_FM -- 0s/0h of 43638 corpus MAILER_AM -- 1s/0h of 43638 corpus MAILER_PMTA

Re: [SAtalk] Some rules for scoring Bulk Mailers

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Carlos, Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 9:57:12 AM, you wrote: CJS> Hi all, CJS> I'm just a newbie in writing rules for spamassassin, but here are CJS> some rules i've write. CJS> Please give me your feedback, if they're ok, not ok, why... I ran

[SAtalk] Some rules for scoring Bulk Mailers

2003-11-04 Thread Carlos Jorge Santos
Hi all, I'm just a newbie in writing rules for spamassassin, but here are some rules i've write. Please give me your feedback, if they're ok, not ok, why... Thanks Carlos J. Santos (Portugal) # # Custom Rules for Bulk Emailers # 04.Oct.2003 - Carlos J. Santos {cajo (at) box (dot) pt] # # This ru