RE: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-30 Thread Vivek Khera
> "IRJ" == Ian R Justman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: IRJ> However, that I remember, it does not reliably close the session when you IRJ> issue a QUIT. That is why I went to McGyver's Net::SMTP::Server code. have you had any luck getting mcgyver to fixup the Net::SMTP::Server module to allo

RE: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-27 Thread Ian R. Justman
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Max Clark wrote: > Has anyone ever used smtpprox? To integrate with Spamassassin and > Postfix? > > http://bent.latency.net/smtpprox/ I looked at that code. In fact, that was one of the original code bases I was using when I was originally designing the SMTP "guts" for wh

RE: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-27 Thread Max Clark
] Smtp Spam Proxy I am looking to integrate Spamassassin with Postfix. Reading the postfix documentation the best way seems to be by forwarding to an smtp server. Is anyone running this code? http://spamassassin.taint.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_SMTP_SmartHost.html Is there a better way to do this? I

Re: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-27 Thread Vivek Khera
> "MC" == Max Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MC> I am looking to integrate Spamassassin with Postfix. Reading the postfix MC> documentation the best way seems to be by forwarding to an smtp server. Just reading this list's archive for the last 5 days will give you several recommendations

Re: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-27 Thread Tony Hoyle
Florin Andrei wrote: >A recent reply i got on this mailing list for a similar question >mentioned amavisd-new as the better solution: > >http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ > >It looks really interesting. > > > Unfortunately amavisd-new has its own issues... some of it can be got around by ha

Re: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-26 Thread Florin Andrei
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 14:35, Max Clark wrote: > I am looking to integrate Spamassassin with Postfix. Reading the postfix > documentation the best way seems to be by forwarding to an smtp server. > > Is anyone running this code? > http://spamassassin.taint.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_SMTP_SmartHost.

Re: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-26 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:19:37PM -0700, Bob Amen wrote: > We quit using this and are currently running sendmail with spamass-milter > as a relay. Uh, Amen! We use sendmail with MIMEdefang (another milter), which also has the advantage that you can scan for viruses at the same time. Dan

Re: [SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-26 Thread Bob Amen
Max Clark wrote: > I am looking to integrate Spamassassin with Postfix. Reading the postfix > documentation the best way seems to be by forwarding to an smtp server. > > Is anyone running this code? > http://spamassassin.taint.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_SMTP_SmartHost.html > > Is there a better

[SAtalk] Smtp Spam Proxy

2002-09-26 Thread Max Clark
I am looking to integrate Spamassassin with Postfix. Reading the postfix documentation the best way seems to be by forwarding to an smtp server. Is anyone running this code? http://spamassassin.taint.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_SMTP_SmartHost.html Is there a better way to do this? I am interested