Re: [SAtalk] Scoring of "HTML only mail..."

2002-02-04 Thread Craig Hughes
This seems actually in the last month or so to have been a very big shift. Definitely a good idea to include some of these things in the non-spam corpus, possibly an even better idea to drop the CTYPE_JUST_HTML rule altogether. It used to be a pretty good one, but it seems like it may no longer

Re: [SAtalk] Scoring of "HTML only mail..."

2002-02-04 Thread Daniel Rogers
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Donald Greer wrote: >The current scoring for HTML_Only mail may be just a little high. > I've recieved reports that some newsletters (which are html-only) are > being rejected as spam. Specifically I allow my users to signup to news > letters from

[SAtalk] Scoring of "HTML only mail..."

2002-02-04 Thread Donald Greer
Folks, The current scoring for HTML_Only mail may be just a little high. I've recieved reports that some newsletters (which are html-only) are being rejected as spam. Specifically I allow my users to signup to news letters from "cluebie.com" (see "http://austintx.cluebie.com"; if you wa