At Sat Nov 15 10:12:56 2003, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> --On Friday, November 14, 2003 11:16 PM + Martin Radford
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think I've ever received legitimate mail like that, but I've
> > certainly sent legitimate mail with the user's username in the subject
>
--On Friday, November 14, 2003 11:16 PM + Martin Radford
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think I've ever received legitimate mail like that, but I've
certainly sent legitimate mail with the user's username in the subject
line. This was some years ago, and I don't think I'd do that nowaday
At Fri Nov 14 13:53:42 2003, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> There seems to be some concern that a more aggressive version of
> this rule would cause too many false positives, but I've *never*
> seen a legitimate message with my name in the subject line. Are
> there really people who do this?
I don't thi
--On Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:43 AM -0800 Kenneth Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any rules to catch the salutation-in-subject pattern?
>
> This looks like something requiring an eval rule. It would check if the
> subject starts with "name,", where "name" is the first word in t
Are there any rules to catch the salutation-in-subject pattern?
This looks like something requiring an eval rule. It would check if the
subject starts with "name,", where "name" is the first word in the To header.
For instance, I get a lot of false negatives with "Kenneth," at the beginning
of the
