Re: [SAtalk] SA-Learn Count Question

2003-11-10 Thread Ken Bass
My guess - if you examine the headers of your spam messages you will see that some message are 'autolearned'. Message that generate a high enough 'spam value' get internally fed to 'sa-learn' and are marked with 'autolearn=spam' in the X-Spam-Status header. Once a message has been trained via sa-le

RE: [SAtalk] SA-Learn Count Question

2003-11-10 Thread SRH-Lists
> Learned from 304 message(s) (30419 message(s) examined) > Learned from 253 message(s) (30430 message(s) examined) > Learned from 301 message(s) (30452 message(s) examined) I bet you are seeing some spam re-learning after it has fallen off of the expiry backend. so the line: Learned from 253 mess

[SAtalk] SA-Learn Count Question

2003-11-10 Thread Scott Renda
We have been using Spamassassin 2.60 since it came out. Prior to that, we were using SA 2.54. I do have a question regarding sa-learn. It seems that the numbers I receive from sa-learn just don't add up. See below for an example. I have a cron job that runs once a day that will run usr/bin/sa-

[SAtalk] Sa-learn Count Question

2003-11-10 Thread Scott Renda
We have been using Spamassassin 2.60 since it came out. Prior to that, we were using SA 2.54. I do have a question regarding sa-learn. It seems that the numbers I receive from sa-learn just don't add up. See below for an example. I have a cron job that runs once a day that will run usr/bin/sa-