15, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Gérard Milhaud
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.3 < SA 2.2 !!!
Gotcha.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Gérard Milhaud wrote:
> Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > It's probably not spam...it's probably a virus.
>
> I don't think so, because my u
ECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.3 < SA 2.2 !!!
Gotcha.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Gérard Milhaud wrote:
> Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > It's probably not spam...it's probably a virus.
>
> I don't think so, because my up-to-date sophos antivirus linked with my
> postfix
Gotcha.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Gérard Milhaud wrote:
> Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > It's probably not spam...it's probably a virus.
>
> I don't think so, because my up-to-date sophos antivirus linked with my
> postfix don't stop this e-mail...
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Gérard Milhaud wr
Mike Burger wrote:
> It's probably not spam...it's probably a virus.
I don't think so, because my up-to-date sophos antivirus linked with my
postfix don't stop this e-mail...
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Gérard Milhaud wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > My SA 2.2 box filters an e-mail that my SA 2.3 bo
It's probably not spam...it's probably a virus.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Gérard Milhaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My SA 2.2 box filters an e-mail that my SA 2.3 box don't filter...
> I've attached this SPAM. It's curious, because SA 2.3 says
> "X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0", the 2.2 says "X-
Hi,
My SA 2.2 box filters an e-mail that my SA 2.3 box don't filter...
I've attached this SPAM. It's curious, because SA 2.3 says
"X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0", the 2.2 says "X-Spam-Status:
Yes, hits=7.0 required=5.0 tests=PORN_10,MAILTO_LINK,FRONTPAGE,BIG_FONT
version=2.20"
